System Architecture
The platform is built on five interconnected modules. Each handles a distinct function, and data flows between them to create a unified audit workflow.
How the Five Modules Work Together
Checklists
Checklists define the inspection criteria. They're templates that specify what questions get asked, what data gets captured, and how results are scored. A checklist created once can be deployed to any number of venues and used by any number of auditors. Checklists exist independently. They aren't tied to specific jobs or venues until deliberately assigned.
Venues
Venues are the database of inspection sites. Unlike audit jobs (which are time-bound operations), venues are permanent records. Every audit conducted at a venue adds to that venue's history. Venues can be tagged, grouped, and categorized with metadata that makes them searchable and filterable when creating audit jobs.
Auditors
Auditors are system users with field access. They're assigned work through audit jobs and use mobile devices to complete checklists at venues. The system tracks which auditor performed which work, creating accountability and enabling performance analysis.
Audit Jobs
Audit jobs are the operational layer. They're time-bound containers that connect checklists to venues and assign both to auditors. Jobs can be ongoing (continuous monitoring) or finite (snapshot audits with start and end dates). When a job is created, it pulls from existing checklists, venues, and auditors rather than creating new ones. This means the same venue can appear in multiple jobs, and the same checklist can be used across different jobs simultaneously.
Reports
Reports are the output layer. They're generated automatically when auditors submit completed checklists. Each report links back to a specific venue, auditor, checklist, and job, maintaining full traceability. Reports can be filtered, searched, downloaded, and analyzed, but the underlying data remains tied to its source.
Data Flow
The system follows a defined information flow:
-
Configuration: Checklists are built. Venues are added to the database. Auditors are registered as users.
-
Assignment: An audit job is created. Existing checklists are assigned to existing venues within that job. Auditors are assigned to venues within that job.
-
Execution: Auditors access their assigned venues and checklists through mobile devices. They complete checklists on location. Data submits to the central system in real time.
-
Storage: Completed checklist data is stored against the specific venue, tied to the auditor who performed the work, and associated with the audit job it belongs to.
-
Reporting: The completed data becomes accessible through the reports interface. It can be viewed, filtered, analyzed, and exported.
Key Architectural Principles
Separation of Concerns
Venues exist independently of jobs. Checklists exist independently of venues. This separation means changes to one don't automatically cascade to others unless explicitly designed to do so (like updating a checklist across all deployments).
Reusability
Create once, use many times. A venue added to the system can be used in unlimited audit jobs over unlimited time periods. A checklist built once can be deployed to thousands of venues. An auditor registered once can be assigned to any number of jobs.
Traceability
Every piece of audit data links back to a specific venue, auditor, checklist, and job. This creates a complete audit trail. If a report shows a problem, you can trace it to the exact venue, see who performed the inspection, view which checklist they used, and identify which job it belonged to.
Centralization
All data lives in one system. There's no separate database for venues, no external checklist library, no standalone auditor management. Everything connects through the platform, eliminating the synchronization problems that plague multi-system approaches.
Real-time operation
Data doesn't batch upload at end-of-day. It flows from field devices to the central system immediately upon submission. Managers see progress as it happens, not hours or days later.
Why This Structure Matters
Paper-based auditing typically creates isolated data: a pile of completed forms in one place, photos in another, venue lists in a spreadsheet, auditor assignments in someone's email. Each audit operation starts from scratch, and historical data is difficult to access or compare.
The modular architecture solves this by treating audit components as persistent, reusable assets. Venues aren't recreated for each job - they're selected from an existing database. Checklists aren't rebuilt each time, they're deployed from a library. Auditors don't need to be re-registered. This approach eliminates duplication, ensures consistency, and makes historical comparison straightforward because the same venue identifier is used across all jobs, all time periods.
The result is a system where setup effort decreases over time (the more you use it, the more reusable assets you have) while data quality increases (standardized checklists, consistent venue records, complete audit trails).